Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MCGAX
FSMAX vs MCGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MCGAX
FSMAX vs MCGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MCGAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and MCGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. MCGAX (139M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MCGAX: FSMAX (0.48) vs MCGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MCGAX: FSMAX (15 years) vs MCGAX (13 years). MCGAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MCGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 109.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGAX: FSMAX (0) vs MCGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. MCGAX (-15.13). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. MCGAX (-35.22).
| FSMAX | MCGAX | FSMAX / MCGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.24 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.24 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.913 | 10.526 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 139M | 31,295% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.38 | -15.13 | -161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.28 | 11.62 | 545% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.12 | -35.22 | -111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.20 | -21.58 | -645% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers