Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MCGAX
FSMAX vs MCGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MCGAX
FSMAX vs MCGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MCGAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and MCGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. MCGAX (139M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MCGAX: FSMAX (0.50) vs MCGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MCGAX: FSMAX (15 years) vs MCGAX (13 years). MCGAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MCGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 109.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGAX: FSMAX (0) vs MCGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. MCGAX (-14.44). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. MCGAX (-37.15).
| FSMAX | MCGAX | FSMAX / MCGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.24 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.24 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 9.547 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 139M | 30,719% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | -14.44 | -202% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 16.99 | 434% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | -37.15 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | -16.55 | -927% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement