Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MCGAX
FSMAX vs MCGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MCGAX
FSMAX vs MCGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MCGAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and MCGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. MCGAX (131M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MCGAX: FSMAX (0.49) vs MCGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MCGAX: FSMAX (15 years) vs MCGAX (13 years). MCGAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MCGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 109.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGAX: FSMAX (0) vs MCGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. MCGAX (-21.81). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. MCGAX (-42.60).
| FSMAX | MCGAX | FSMAX / MCGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.24 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.24 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 4.406 | 303% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 131M | 30,611% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.05 | -21.81 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.92 | 7.30 | 876% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | -42.60 | -77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.42 | -24.81 | -538% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement