Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MCPRX
FSMAX vs MCPRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MCPRX
FSMAX vs MCPRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MCPRX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and MCPRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. MCPRX (12.7B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MCPRX: FSMAX (0.49) vs MCPRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MCPRX: FSMAX (15 years) vs MCPRX (23 years). MCPRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MCPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and MCPRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.31 vs. MCPRX (-17.98). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.17 vs. MCPRX (-23.33).
| FSMAX | MCPRX | FSMAX / MCPRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.27 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.28 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.960 | 1.319 | 1,134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 12.7B | 316% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.31 | -17.98 | -102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.42 | -1.29 | -4,857% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.17 | -23.33 | -134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.51 | 61.57 | 210% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement