Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MCPRX
FSMAX vs MCPRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MCPRX
FSMAX vs MCPRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MCPRX commentary
Aug 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and MCPRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. MCPRX (13.2B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MCPRX: FSMAX (0.50) vs MCPRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MCPRX: FSMAX (15 years) vs MCPRX (23 years). MCPRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MCPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and MCPRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.03 vs. MCPRX (-17.11). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.38 vs. MCPRX (-19.14).
| FSMAX | MCPRX | FSMAX / MCPRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.27 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.28 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.476 | 3.298 | 469% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 13.2B | 304% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.03 | -17.11 | -135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.39 | 2.44 | 2,555% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.38 | -19.14 | -180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.05 | 65.89 | 203% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement