Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MEFAX
FSMAX vs MEFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MEFAX
FSMAX vs MEFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MEFAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and MEFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. MEFAX (1.96B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MEFAX: FSMAX (0.50) vs MEFAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MEFAX: FSMAX (15 years) vs MEFAX (26 years). MEFAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MEFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MEFAX: FSMAX (0) vs MEFAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. MEFAX (-18.06). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. MEFAX (-58.06).
| FSMAX | MEFAX | FSMAX / MEFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.16 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.18 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | 7.530 | 225% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 1.96B | 2,044% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.68 | -18.06 | -131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.74 | -23.19 | -314% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.14 | -58.06 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.49 | -36.94 | -364% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers