Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MGPSX
FSMAX vs MGPSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MGPSX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$92.17
Change+$1.25 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Svc
Price$75.50
Change+$0.97 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.98M
FSMAX vs MGPSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MGPSX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and MGPSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. MGPSX (3.98M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MGPSX: FSMAX (0.50) vs MGPSX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MGPSX: FSMAX (14 years) vs MGPSX (24 years). MGPSX (3.03) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MGPSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 650.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGPSX: FSMAX (0) vs MGPSX (15000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. MGPSX (-1.42). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.38 vs. MGPSX (2.00).
| FSMAX | MGPSX | FSMAX / MGPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.78 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 3.03 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.044 | -2.817 | -2% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 15000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 3.98M | 944,486% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | -1.42 | -1,030% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.69 | 21.42 | 204% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.38 | 2.00 | 3,222% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.79 | 21.78 | 339% |