Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs MGPSX
FSMAX vs MGPSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MGPSX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$76.01
Change-$3.55 (-4.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Svc
Price$65.26
Change-$2.71 (-3.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.46M
FSMAX vs MGPSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MGPSX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and MGPSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. MGPSX (3.46M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MGPSX: FSMAX (0.53) vs MGPSX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MGPSX: FSMAX (14 years) vs MGPSX (24 years). MGPSX (3.03) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MGPSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 650.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGPSX: FSMAX (0) vs MGPSX (15000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.02 vs. MGPSX (-11.47). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 67.38 vs. MGPSX (3.44).
| FSMAX | MGPSX | FSMAX / MGPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.78 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 3.03 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.456 | -11.370 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 15000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 3.46M | 1,054,913% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.02 | -11.47 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.74 | -2.44 | -358% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.38 | 3.44 | 1,959% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.16 | 8.87 | 554% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...