Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MGPSX
FSMAX vs MGPSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MGPSX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.47
Change+$0.80 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Svc
Price$76.43
Change+$0.40 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.1M
FSMAX vs MGPSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MGPSX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and MGPSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. MGPSX (4.1M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MGPSX: FSMAX (0.47) vs MGPSX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MGPSX: FSMAX (14 years) vs MGPSX (24 years). MGPSX (3.03) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MGPSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 650.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGPSX: FSMAX (0) vs MGPSX (15000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. MGPSX (-5.45). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 57.86 vs. MGPSX (-2.60).
| FSMAX | MGPSX | FSMAX / MGPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.78 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 3.03 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.950 | -0.861 | -459% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 15000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 4.1M | 955,166% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.27 | -5.45 | -207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.72 | 25.81 | 204% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.86 | -2.60 | -2,225% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.23 | 21.98 | 356% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement