Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MGPSX
FSMAX vs MGPSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MGPSX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.73
Change-$0.08 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Svc
Price$79.88
Change-$0.25 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.29M
FSMAX vs MGPSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MGPSX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and MGPSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. MGPSX (4.29M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MGPSX: FSMAX (0.44) vs MGPSX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MGPSX: FSMAX (14 years) vs MGPSX (24 years). MGPSX (3.03) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MGPSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 650.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGPSX: FSMAX (0) vs MGPSX (15000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.87 vs. MGPSX (3.82). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.22 vs. MGPSX (-0.12).
| FSMAX | MGPSX | FSMAX / MGPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.78 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 3.03 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.926 | 4.486 | 244% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 15000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 4.29M | 954,821% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.87 | 3.82 | 494% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.27 | 28.06 | 204% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.22 | -0.12 | -48,313% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.30 | 35.86 | 288% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers