Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs MGPSX
FSMAX vs MGPSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MGPSX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.04
Change+$1.04 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.78B
ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Svc
Price$80.01
Change+$0.96 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.96M
FSMAX vs MGPSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MGPSX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and MGPSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.8B vs. MGPSX (3.96M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MGPSX: FSMAX (1.10) vs MGPSX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MGPSX: FSMAX (13 years) vs MGPSX (23 years). MGPSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 382.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGPSX: FSMAX (0) vs MGPSX (15000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.28 vs. MGPSX (15.42). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 54.34 vs. MGPSX (-0.89).
| FSMAX | MGPSX | FSMAX / MGPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.533 | 3.077 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 15000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8B | 3.96M | 1,029,523% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.28 | 15.42 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.87 | 10.50 | 237% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.34 | -0.89 | -6,105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.07 | 34.05 | 262% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...