Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MGPSX
FSMAX vs MGPSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MGPSX
FSMAX vs MGPSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MGPSX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and MGPSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. MGPSX (5.76M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MGPSX: FSMAX (0.50) vs MGPSX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MGPSX: FSMAX (15 years) vs MGPSX (25 years). MGPSX (3.11) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MGPSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 457.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGPSX: FSMAX (0) vs MGPSX (15000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. MGPSX (16.35). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. MGPSX (-12.08).
| FSMAX | MGPSX | FSMAX / MGPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.78 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 3.11 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | 17.486 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 15000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 5.76M | 696,785% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.68 | 16.35 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.74 | 38.73 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.14 | -12.08 | -332% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.49 | 41.64 | 323% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers