Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MGPSX
FSMAX vs MGPSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MGPSX
FSMAX vs MGPSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MGPSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and MGPSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. MGPSX (5.6M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MGPSX: FSMAX (0.50) vs MGPSX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MGPSX: FSMAX (15 years) vs MGPSX (25 years). MGPSX (3.11) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MGPSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 457.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGPSX: FSMAX (0) vs MGPSX (15000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.47 vs. MGPSX (22.57). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.19 vs. MGPSX (-11.26).
| FSMAX | MGPSX | FSMAX / MGPSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.78 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 3.11 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.556 | 18.271 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 15000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 5.6M | 762,364% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.47 | 22.57 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.03 | 43.29 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.19 | -11.26 | -312% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.75 | 54.08 | 284% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers