Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MGRFX
FSMAX vs MGRFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MGRFX
FSMAX vs MGRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MGRFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and MGRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. MGRFX (1.77B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MGRFX: FSMAX (0.49) vs MGRFX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MGRFX: FSMAX (15 years) vs MGRFX (26 years). MGRFX (0.78) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MGRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and MGRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. MGRFX (-16.55). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. MGRFX (-48.23).
| FSMAX | MGRFX | FSMAX / MGRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.76 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.78 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 1.859 | 719% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 1.77B | 2,266% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.05 | -16.55 | -79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.92 | -13.27 | -481% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | -48.23 | -68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.42 | -11.12 | -1,200% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers