Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MIDKX
FSMAX vs MIDKX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MIDKX
FSMAX vs MIDKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MIDKX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and MIDKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. MIDKX (113M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MIDKX: FSMAX (0.49) vs MIDKX (0.36). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MIDKX: FSMAX (15 years) vs MIDKX (23 years). MIDKX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. MIDKX (12.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIDKX: FSMAX (0) vs MIDKX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. MIDKX (6.91). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. MIDKX (-1.48).
| FSMAX | MIDKX | FSMAX / MIDKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.13 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.13 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 12.459 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 113M | 35,487% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.36 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.05 | 6.91 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.92 | 19.32 | 331% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | -1.48 | -2,211% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.42 | 12.74 | 1,047% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers