Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MIDKX
FSMAX vs MIDKX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MIDKX
FSMAX vs MIDKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MIDKX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and MIDKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. MIDKX (118M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MIDKX: FSMAX (0.50) vs MIDKX (0.33). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MIDKX: FSMAX (15 years) vs MIDKX (23 years). MIDKX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. MIDKX (12.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIDKX: FSMAX (0) vs MIDKX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. MIDKX (19.48). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. MIDKX (0.81).
| FSMAX | MIDKX | FSMAX / MIDKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.13 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.13 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 14.622 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 118M | 36,186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.33 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | 19.48 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 24.89 | 297% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | 0.81 | 4,144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | 19.75 | 777% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers