Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MIDKX
FSMAX vs MIDKX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MIDKX
FSMAX vs MIDKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MIDKX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and MIDKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. MIDKX (115M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MIDKX: FSMAX (0.50) vs MIDKX (0.33). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MIDKX: FSMAX (15 years) vs MIDKX (23 years). MIDKX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. MIDKX (12.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIDKX: FSMAX (0) vs MIDKX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.51 vs. MIDKX (19.55). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.00 vs. MIDKX (-1.64).
| FSMAX | MIDKX | FSMAX / MIDKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.13 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.13 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.668 | 13.475 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 115M | 37,130% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.33 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.51 | 19.55 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.53 | 24.24 | 295% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.00 | -1.64 | -2,250% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.36 | 15.05 | 939% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers