Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MIMSX
FSMAX vs MIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MIMSX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.74
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
BNY Mellon Mid Cap Multi-Strategy I
Price$15.05
Change+$0.17 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets673.53M
FSMAX vs MIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MIMSX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and MIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. MIMSX (674M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MIMSX: FSMAX (0.44) vs MIMSX (0.10). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MIMSX: FSMAX (14 years) vs MIMSX (24 years). MIMSX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MIMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.97 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIMSX: FSMAX (0) vs MIMSX (10000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.13 vs. MIMSX (-11.76). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.52 vs. MIMSX (-18.70).
| FSMAX | MIMSX | FSMAX / MIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.18 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.18 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.849 | 8.218 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 674M | 6,083% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.10 | 457% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.13 | -11.76 | -154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.96 | -14.00 | -400% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.52 | -18.70 | -324% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.35 | 3.28 | 3,147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers