Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MMCGX
FSMAX vs MMCGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MMCGX
FSMAX vs MMCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MMCGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and MMCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. MMCGX (803M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MMCGX: FSMAX (0.48) vs MMCGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MMCGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs MMCGX (13 years). MMCGX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MMCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMCGX: FSMAX (0) vs MMCGX (5000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. MMCGX (-1.95). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. MMCGX (-40.92).
| FSMAX | MMCGX | FSMAX / MMCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.63 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.63 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.913 | 3.446 | 462% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 803M | 5,417% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.38 | -1.95 | -1,249% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.28 | 80.64 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.12 | -40.92 | -96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.20 | -16.92 | -823% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers