Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MMCGX
FSMAX vs MMCGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MMCGX
FSMAX vs MMCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MMCGX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and MMCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. MMCGX (784M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MMCGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs MMCGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MMCGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs MMCGX (13 years). MMCGX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MMCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMCGX: FSMAX (0) vs MMCGX (5000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.47 vs. MMCGX (-2.56). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.19 vs. MMCGX (-45.68).
| FSMAX | MMCGX | FSMAX / MMCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.63 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.63 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.556 | -0.436 | -3,571% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 784M | 5,446% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.47 | -2.56 | -1,191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.03 | 90.45 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.19 | -45.68 | -77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.75 | -16.12 | -954% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers