Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MMCRX
FSMAX vs MMCRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MMCRX
FSMAX vs MMCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MMCRX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and MMCRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. MMCRX (1.61B). FSMAX (0.49) and MMCRX (0.48) have matching dividends . FSMAX was incepted earlier than MMCRX: FSMAX (15 years) vs MMCRX (15 years). MMCRX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. MMCRX (17.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMCRX: FSMAX (0) vs MMCRX (500000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. MMCRX (-2.44). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. MMCRX (21.13).
| FSMAX | MMCRX | FSMAX / MMCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.72 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.72 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 3.434 | 389% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 1.61B | 2,497% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.48 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.05 | -2.44 | -535% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.92 | 18.28 | 350% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | 21.13 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.42 | 98.13 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement