Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MMCRX
FSMAX vs MMCRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MMCRX
FSMAX vs MMCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MMCRX commentary
Aug 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and MMCRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. MMCRX (1.73B). FSMAX (0.50) and MMCRX (0.49) have matching dividends . FSMAX was incepted earlier than MMCRX: FSMAX (15 years) vs MMCRX (14 years). MMCRX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. MMCRX (17.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMCRX: FSMAX (0) vs MMCRX (500000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.93 vs. MMCRX (6.95). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.97 vs. MMCRX (26.60).
| FSMAX | MMCRX | FSMAX / MMCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.72 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.72 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.344 | 10.120 | 201% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 1.73B | 2,318% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.49 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.93 | 6.95 | 373% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.27 | 25.16 | 295% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.97 | 26.60 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.05 | 108.12 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers