Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MMCRX
FSMAX vs MMCRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MMCRX
FSMAX vs MMCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MMCRX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and MMCRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. MMCRX (1.65B). MMCRX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: MMCRX (0.53) vs FSMAX (0.50). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MMCRX: FSMAX (15 years) vs MMCRX (14 years). MMCRX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. MMCRX (17.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MMCRX: FSMAX (0) vs MMCRX (500000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.08 vs. MMCRX (-1.35). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.47 vs. MMCRX (20.10).
| FSMAX | MMCRX | FSMAX / MMCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.72 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.72 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.890 | -1.205 | -1,236% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 1.65B | 2,582% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.53 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.08 | -1.35 | -2,230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.38 | 22.42 | 327% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.47 | 20.10 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.95 | 90.97 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers