Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MXBUX
FSMAX vs MXBUX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MXBUX
FSMAX vs MXBUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MXBUX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and MXBUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. MXBUX (1.59B). MXBUX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: MXBUX (2.58) vs FSMAX (0.49). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MXBUX: FSMAX (15 years) vs MXBUX (9 years). MXBUX (0.82) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. MXBUX (18.00). FSMAX (0) and MXBUX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. MXBUX (-1.78). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.57 vs. MXBUX (-5.38).
| FSMAX | MXBUX | FSMAX / MXBUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.80 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.82 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.490 | 10.010 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 1.59B | 2,525% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 2.58 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.03 | -1.78 | -677% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.71 | 13.09 | 510% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.57 | -5.38 | -606% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement