Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MXMDX
FSMAX vs MXMDX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MXMDX
FSMAX vs MXMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MXMDX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and MXMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. MXMDX (1.59B). MXMDX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: MXMDX (1.24) vs FSMAX (0.49). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MXMDX: FSMAX (15 years) vs MXMDX (16 years). MXMDX (0.54) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. MXMDX (18.00). FSMAX (0) and MXMDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. MXMDX (6.02). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.57 vs. MXMDX (19.37).
| FSMAX | MXMDX | FSMAX / MXMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.54 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.54 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.490 | 10.942 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 1.59B | 2,525% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.24 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.03 | 6.02 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.71 | 31.80 | 210% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.57 | 19.37 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.27 | 72.54 | 181% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers