Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MXMGX
FSMAX vs MXMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MXMGX
FSMAX vs MXMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MXMGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and MXMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. MXMGX (1.99B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MXMGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs MXMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MXMGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs MXMGX (29 years). MXMGX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MXMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and MXMGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. MXMGX (4.50). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. MXMGX (-3.18).
| FSMAX | MXMGX | FSMAX / MXMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.02 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.03 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 1.626 | 949% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 1.99B | 2,146% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | 4.50 | 649% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 15.70 | 470% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | -3.18 | -1,058% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | 82.12 | 187% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers