Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MXMGX
FSMAX vs MXMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MXMGX
FSMAX vs MXMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MXMGX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and MXMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. MXMGX (1.95B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MXMGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs MXMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MXMGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs MXMGX (29 years). MXMGX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MXMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and MXMGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. MXMGX (1.94). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. MXMGX (-6.33).
| FSMAX | MXMGX | FSMAX / MXMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.02 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.03 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 2.071 | 646% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 1.95B | 2,056% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | 1.94 | 1,061% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 9.17 | 609% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -6.33 | -524% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | 72.15 | 185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers