Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NBMBX
FSMAX vs NBMBX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NBMBX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.88
Change-$0.07 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Adv
Price$18.86
Change+$0.15 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
FSMAX vs NBMBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NBMBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NBMBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. NBMBX (2.06B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NBMBX: FSMAX (0.46) vs NBMBX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NBMBX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NBMBX (29 years). NBMBX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NBMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and NBMBX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.74 vs. NBMBX (19.71). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.34 vs. NBMBX (4.20).
| FSMAX | NBMBX | FSMAX / NBMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.20 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.20 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.478 | 11.502 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 2.06B | 1,924% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.74 | 19.71 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.63 | 23.09 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.34 | 4.20 | 1,221% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.66 | 25.99 | 314% |