Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NBMBX
FSMAX vs NBMBX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NBMBX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.79
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.46B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Adv
Price$17.96
Change+$0.08 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.96B
FSMAX vs NBMBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NBMBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NBMBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.5B vs. NBMBX (1.96B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NBMBX: FSMAX (0.43) vs NBMBX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NBMBX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NBMBX (29 years). NBMBX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NBMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and NBMBX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.62 vs. NBMBX (-7.94). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.53 vs. NBMBX (-14.94).
| FSMAX | NBMBX | FSMAX / NBMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.20 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.20 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.492 | 4.787 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.5B | 1.96B | 2,114% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.62 | -7.94 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.92 | 25.15 | 198% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.53 | -14.94 | -224% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.09 | 27.39 | 343% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement