Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs NBMBX
FSMAX vs NBMBX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NBMBX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$77.78
Change+$0.62 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Adv
Price$14.88
Change+$0.09 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.62B
FSMAX vs NBMBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NBMBX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NBMBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. NBMBX (1.62B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NBMBX: FSMAX (0.53) vs NBMBX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NBMBX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NBMBX (29 years). NBMBX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NBMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and NBMBX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.35 vs. NBMBX (-7.74). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.85 vs. NBMBX (1.65).
| FSMAX | NBMBX | FSMAX / NBMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.20 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.20 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.097 | -11.859 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 1.62B | 2,257% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.35 | -7.74 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.53 | -7.33 | -75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.85 | 1.65 | 3,699% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.71 | 1.91 | 2,338% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...