Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs NBMBX
FSMAX vs NBMBX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NBMBX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$87.51
Change-$2.38 (-2.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.44B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Adv
Price$16.23
Change-$0.36 (-2.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.84B
FSMAX vs NBMBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NBMBX commentary
Mar 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NBMBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.4B vs. NBMBX (1.84B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NBMBX: FSMAX (1.10) vs NBMBX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NBMBX: FSMAX (13 years) vs NBMBX (29 years). NBMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX (0) and NBMBX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.88 vs. NBMBX (-1.54). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.65 vs. NBMBX (5.83).
| FSMAX | NBMBX | FSMAX / NBMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.089 | -1.132 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.4B | 1.84B | 2,138% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.88 | -1.54 | -705% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.86 | 3.95 | 579% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.65 | 5.83 | 902% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.94 | 18.01 | 399% |