Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs NBMBX
FSMAX vs NBMBX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NBMBX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$83.62
Change+$0.28 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.02B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Adv
Price$16.66
Change+$0.35 (+2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
FSMAX vs NBMBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NBMBX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NBMBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36B vs. NBMBX (1.79B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NBMBX: FSMAX (0.54) vs NBMBX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NBMBX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NBMBX (29 years). NBMBX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NBMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and NBMBX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.11 vs. NBMBX (-1.52). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 59.98 vs. NBMBX (4.72).
| FSMAX | NBMBX | FSMAX / NBMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.20 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.20 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.297 | -3.754 | 221% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36B | 1.79B | 2,008% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.11 | -1.52 | -204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.26 | 11.92 | 212% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.98 | 4.72 | 1,271% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.52 | 12.46 | 470% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...