Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs NBMBX
FSMAX vs NBMBX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NBMBX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.04
Change+$1.04 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.78B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Adv
Price$18.13
Change+$0.25 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.96B
FSMAX vs NBMBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NBMBX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NBMBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.8B vs. NBMBX (1.96B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NBMBX: FSMAX (1.10) vs NBMBX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NBMBX: FSMAX (13 years) vs NBMBX (28 years). NBMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX (0) and NBMBX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.28 vs. NBMBX (17.55). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 54.34 vs. NBMBX (11.61).
| FSMAX | NBMBX | FSMAX / NBMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.533 | 6.555 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8B | 1.96B | 2,085% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.28 | 17.55 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.87 | 7.32 | 340% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.34 | 11.61 | 468% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.07 | 35.49 | 251% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers