Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NBMBX
FSMAX vs NBMBX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NBMBX
FSMAX vs NBMBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NBMBX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NBMBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. NBMBX (2.26B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NBMBX: FSMAX (0.50) vs NBMBX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NBMBX: FSMAX (15 years) vs NBMBX (30 years). NBMBX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NBMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and NBMBX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.51 vs. NBMBX (-8.93). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.00 vs. NBMBX (-20.59).
| FSMAX | NBMBX | FSMAX / NBMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.18 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.18 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.668 | 11.347 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 2.26B | 1,887% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.51 | -8.93 | -342% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.53 | 15.25 | 469% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.00 | -20.59 | -180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.36 | 25.72 | 550% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers