Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NBMLX
FSMAX vs NBMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NBMLX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.52
Change+$2.13 (+2.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Inst
Price$19.32
Change+$0.24 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
FSMAX vs NBMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NBMLX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NBMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. NBMLX (2.03B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NBMLX: FSMAX (0.46) vs NBMLX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NBMLX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NBMLX (18 years). NBMLX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NBMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBMLX: FSMAX (0) vs NBMLX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.65 vs. NBMLX (16.77). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.36 vs. NBMLX (6.53).
| FSMAX | NBMLX | FSMAX / NBMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.69 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.69 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.862 | 11.319 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 2.03B | 1,948% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.65 | 16.77 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.04 | 20.61 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.36 | 6.53 | 756% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.68 | 24.70 | 331% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement