Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs NBMLX
FSMAX vs NBMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NBMLX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$77.15
Change+$1.14 (+1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Inst
Price$15.11
Change+$0.17 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
FSMAX vs NBMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NBMLX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NBMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. NBMLX (1.6B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NBMLX: FSMAX (0.53) vs NBMLX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NBMLX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NBMLX (18 years). NBMLX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NBMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBMLX: FSMAX (0) vs NBMLX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.89 vs. NBMLX (-12.17). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 59.91 vs. NBMLX (9.11).
| FSMAX | NBMLX | FSMAX / NBMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.69 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.69 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.362 | -12.835 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 1.6B | 2,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.89 | -12.17 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.94 | -6.80 | -58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.91 | 9.11 | 658% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.51 | 1.32 | 3,214% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...