Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NBMLX
FSMAX vs NBMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NBMLX
FSMAX vs NBMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NBMLX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NBMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. NBMLX (2.29B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NBMLX: FSMAX (0.48) vs NBMLX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NBMLX: FSMAX (15 years) vs NBMLX (19 years). NBMLX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NBMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBMLX: FSMAX (0) vs NBMLX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. NBMLX (-15.96). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. NBMLX (-27.51).
| FSMAX | NBMLX | FSMAX / NBMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.68 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.68 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.913 | 6.480 | 246% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 2.29B | 1,896% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.38 | -15.96 | -153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.28 | 4.13 | 1,531% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.12 | -27.51 | -142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.20 | 22.37 | 622% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers