Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NBMTX
FSMAX vs NBMTX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NBMTX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$95.09
Change+$0.88 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Tr
Price$18.74
Change+$0.26 (+1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.02B
FSMAX vs NBMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NBMTX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NBMTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. NBMTX (2.02B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NBMTX: FSMAX (0.47) vs NBMTX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NBMTX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NBMTX (32 years). NBMTX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NBMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and NBMTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.61 vs. NBMTX (11.35). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.88 vs. NBMTX (10.34).
| FSMAX | NBMTX | FSMAX / NBMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.94 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.94 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.632 | 10.560 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 2.02B | 1,942% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.61 | 11.35 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.62 | 39.64 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.88 | 10.34 | 628% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.19 | 29.36 | 276% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement