Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NBMTX
FSMAX vs NBMTX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NBMTX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$87.12
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.02B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Tr
Price$17.28
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.88B
FSMAX vs NBMTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NBMTX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NBMTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36B vs. NBMTX (1.88B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NBMTX: FSMAX (0.54) vs NBMTX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NBMTX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NBMTX (32 years). NBMTX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NBMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and NBMTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.44 vs. NBMTX (2.67). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.33 vs. NBMTX (9.01).
| FSMAX | NBMTX | FSMAX / NBMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.94 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.94 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.357 | 2.006 | -217% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36B | 1.88B | 1,919% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.44 | 2.67 | 241% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.01 | 24.57 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.33 | 9.01 | 703% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.99 | 19.45 | 324% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers