Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NBMTX
FSMAX vs NBMTX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NBMTX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.15
Change+$0.93 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Tr
Price$19.62
Change+$0.16 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.13B
FSMAX vs NBMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NBMTX commentary
Oct 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NBMTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. NBMTX (2.13B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NBMTX: FSMAX (0.44) vs NBMTX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NBMTX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NBMTX (32 years). NBMTX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NBMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and NBMTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.43 vs. NBMTX (7.16). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.38 vs. NBMTX (-2.01).
| FSMAX | NBMTX | FSMAX / NBMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.94 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.94 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.478 | 14.246 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 2.13B | 1,940% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.43 | 7.16 | 229% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.32 | 41.35 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.38 | -2.01 | -2,559% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.66 | 43.32 | 251% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement