Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs NBMTX
FSMAX vs NBMTX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NBMTX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$91.19
Change-$2.88 (-3.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.92B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Tr
Price$17.26
Change-$0.68 (-3.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.89B
FSMAX vs NBMTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NBMTX commentary
Feb 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NBMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.9B vs. NBMTX (1.89B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NBMTX: FSMAX (1.10) vs NBMTX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NBMTX: FSMAX (13 years) vs NBMTX (32 years). NBMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX (0) and NBMTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.39 vs. NBMTX (3.98). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.45 vs. NBMTX (3.58).
| FSMAX | NBMTX | FSMAX / NBMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.341 | 1.829 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.9B | 1.89B | 2,217% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.39 | 3.98 | 387% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.35 | 6.74 | 361% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.45 | 3.58 | 1,157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.15 | 24.83 | 291% |