Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NBMTX
FSMAX vs NBMTX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NBMTX
FSMAX vs NBMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NBMTX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NBMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. NBMTX (2.27B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NBMTX: FSMAX (0.50) vs NBMTX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NBMTX: FSMAX (15 years) vs NBMTX (33 years). NBMTX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NBMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and NBMTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. NBMTX (-9.75). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. NBMTX (-25.07).
| FSMAX | NBMTX | FSMAX / NBMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.93 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.93 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 11.058 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 2.27B | 1,879% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | -9.75 | -300% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 14.26 | 518% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | -25.07 | -134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | 34.26 | 448% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers