Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NBNGX
FSMAX vs NBNGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NBNGX
FSMAX vs NBNGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NBNGX commentary
Jul 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NBNGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. NBNGX (236M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NBNGX: FSMAX (0.48) vs NBNGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NBNGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs NBNGX (44 years). NBNGX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NBNGX (6.67). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNGX: FSMAX (0) vs NBNGX (5000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.55 vs. NBNGX (15.93). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.17 vs. NBNGX (12.04).
| FSMAX | NBNGX | FSMAX / NBNGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.25 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.25 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.297 | 12.299 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 236M | 18,432% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.55 | 15.93 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.52 | 42.78 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.17 | 12.04 | 309% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.41 | 86.17 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers