Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NBNGX
FSMAX vs NBNGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NBNGX
FSMAX vs NBNGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NBNGX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NBNGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. NBNGX (238M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NBNGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs NBNGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NBNGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs NBNGX (44 years). NBNGX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NBNGX (6.67). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNGX: FSMAX (0) vs NBNGX (5000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.51 vs. NBNGX (19.25). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.00 vs. NBNGX (18.36).
| FSMAX | NBNGX | FSMAX / NBNGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.25 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.25 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.668 | 11.868 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 238M | 17,941% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.51 | 19.25 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.53 | 48.52 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.00 | 18.36 | 202% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.36 | 80.76 | 175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers