Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NBNGX
FSMAX vs NBNGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NBNGX
FSMAX vs NBNGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NBNGX commentary
Sep 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NBNGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. NBNGX (234M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NBNGX: FSMAX (0.49) vs NBNGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NBNGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs NBNGX (44 years). NBNGX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NBNGX (10.68). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNGX: FSMAX (0) vs NBNGX (5000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.49 vs. NBNGX (7.31). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.40 vs. NBNGX (6.79).
| FSMAX | NBNGX | FSMAX / NBNGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.25 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.25 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.609 | 11.516 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 234M | 17,137% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.49 | 7.31 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.03 | 43.50 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.40 | 6.79 | 521% |
| Returns for 10 years | 138.83 | 79.85 | 174% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers