Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NCTWX
FSMAX vs NCTWX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NCTWX
FSMAX vs NCTWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NCTWX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NCTWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. NCTWX (919M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NCTWX: FSMAX (0.49) vs NCTWX (0.07). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NCTWX: FSMAX (15 years) vs NCTWX (43 years). NCTWX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NCTWX (0.32). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NCTWX: FSMAX (0) vs NCTWX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.47 vs. NCTWX (-8.66). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.87 vs. NCTWX (-16.71).
| FSMAX | NCTWX | FSMAX / NCTWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.59 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.59 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.894 | 4.302 | 300% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 919M | 4,363% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.07 | 741% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.47 | -8.66 | -156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.41 | 2.17 | 2,971% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.87 | -16.71 | -191% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.70 | 25.54 | 512% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement