Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMCAX
FSMAX vs NMCAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMCAX
FSMAX vs NMCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMCAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NMCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. NMCAX (594M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMCAX: FSMAX (0.50) vs NMCAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMCAX: FSMAX (15 years) vs NMCAX (28 years). NMCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMCAX: FSMAX (0) vs NMCAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. NMCAX (-8.39). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. NMCAX (-31.58).
| FSMAX | NMCAX | FSMAX / NMCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.19 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.19 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 8.818 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 594M | 7,189% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | -8.39 | -348% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 4.10 | 1,803% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | -31.58 | -107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | -18.56 | -827% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement