Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMCAX
FSMAX vs NMCAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMCAX
FSMAX vs NMCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMCAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NMCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. NMCAX (578M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMCAX: FSMAX (0.48) vs NMCAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMCAX: FSMAX (15 years) vs NMCAX (28 years). NMCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMCAX: FSMAX (0) vs NMCAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. NMCAX (-10.45). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. NMCAX (-31.23).
| FSMAX | NMCAX | FSMAX / NMCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.19 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.19 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.913 | 9.457 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 578M | 7,526% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.38 | -10.45 | -233% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.28 | -0.17 | -36,194% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.12 | -31.23 | -125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.20 | -22.84 | -610% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement