Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMCCX
FSMAX vs NMCCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMCCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.73
Change-$0.08 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
Voya MidCap Opportunities C
Price$6.99
Change-$0.03 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets728.54M
FSMAX vs NMCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMCCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NMCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. NMCCX (729M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMCCX: FSMAX (0.44) vs NMCCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMCCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMCCX (27 years). NMCCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMCCX: FSMAX (0) vs NMCCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.87 vs. NMCCX (-12.36). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.22 vs. NMCCX (-52.95).
| FSMAX | NMCCX | FSMAX / NMCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.00 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.00 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.926 | 9.176 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 729M | 5,624% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.87 | -12.36 | -153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.27 | 5.41 | 1,059% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.22 | -52.95 | -114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.30 | -62.58 | -165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers