Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMCCX
FSMAX vs NMCCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMCCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$99.12
Change+$0.54 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
Voya MidCap Opportunities C
Price$6.93
Change+$0.04 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets715.09M
FSMAX vs NMCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMCCX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NMCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. NMCCX (715M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMCCX: FSMAX (0.46) vs NMCCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMCCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMCCX (27 years). NMCCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMCCX: FSMAX (0) vs NMCCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.07 vs. NMCCX (-12.94). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.94 vs. NMCCX (-54.44).
| FSMAX | NMCCX | FSMAX / NMCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.00 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.00 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.473 | 7.776 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 715M | 5,538% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.07 | -12.94 | -124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.49 | 0.73 | 6,398% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.94 | -54.44 | -95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.25 | -63.43 | -155% |