Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs NMCCX
FSMAX vs NMCCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMCCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$84.65
Change+$1.43 (+1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Voya MidCap Opportunities C
Price$6.01
Change+$0.11 (+1.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets642.75M
FSMAX vs NMCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMCCX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NMCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. NMCCX (643M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMCCX: FSMAX (0.53) vs NMCCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMCCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMCCX (27 years). NMCCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMCCX: FSMAX (0) vs NMCCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.49 vs. NMCCX (-29.00). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 102.79 vs. NMCCX (-42.72).
| FSMAX | NMCCX | FSMAX / NMCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.00 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.00 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.429 | -8.243 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 643M | 5,677% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.49 | -29.00 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.51 | -23.77 | -32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.79 | -42.72 | -241% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.37 | -70.38 | -79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers