Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMCCX
FSMAX vs NMCCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMCCX
FSMAX vs NMCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMCCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NMCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. NMCCX (578M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMCCX: FSMAX (0.48) vs NMCCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMCCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs NMCCX (28 years). NMCCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMCCX: FSMAX (0) vs NMCCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. NMCCX (-44.58). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. NMCCX (-73.90).
| FSMAX | NMCCX | FSMAX / NMCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.94 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.94 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.913 | 9.064 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 578M | 7,526% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.38 | -44.58 | -55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.28 | -50.46 | -125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.12 | -73.90 | -53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.20 | -79.19 | -176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers