Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMCCX
FSMAX vs NMCCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMCCX
FSMAX vs NMCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMCCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NMCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. NMCCX (594M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMCCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs NMCCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMCCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs NMCCX (28 years). NMCCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMCCX: FSMAX (0) vs NMCCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. NMCCX (-43.36). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. NMCCX (-74.04).
| FSMAX | NMCCX | FSMAX / NMCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.94 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.94 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 8.480 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 594M | 7,189% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | -43.36 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | -48.33 | -153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | -74.04 | -45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | -78.03 | -197% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers