Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs NMGAX
FSMAX vs NMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$77.78
Change+$0.62 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth A
Price$14.97
Change+$0.09 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.62B
FSMAX vs NMGAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NMGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. NMGAX (1.62B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGAX: FSMAX (0.53) vs NMGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMGAX (16 years). NMGAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs NMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.35 vs. NMGAX (-7.58). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.85 vs. NMGAX (2.48).
| FSMAX | NMGAX | FSMAX / NMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.06 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.06 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.097 | -11.848 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 1.62B | 2,257% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.35 | -7.58 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.53 | -6.88 | -80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.85 | 2.48 | 2,457% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.71 | 3.28 | 1,362% |