Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs NMGAX
FSMAX vs NMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$85.11
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.02B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth A
Price$16.72
Change-$0.05 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.83B
FSMAX vs NMGAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGAX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NMGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36B vs. NMGAX (1.83B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGAX: FSMAX (0.54) vs NMGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMGAX (16 years). NMGAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs NMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.85 vs. NMGAX (1.09). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.38 vs. NMGAX (8.66).
| FSMAX | NMGAX | FSMAX / NMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.06 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.06 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.349 | -0.948 | 670% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36B | 1.83B | 1,970% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.85 | 1.09 | 445% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.86 | 20.90 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.38 | 8.66 | 732% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.32 | 17.60 | 354% |