Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMGAX
FSMAX vs NMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.72
Change+$1.18 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth A
Price$19.44
Change+$0.30 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.12B
FSMAX vs NMGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NMGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. NMGAX (2.12B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGAX: FSMAX (0.44) vs NMGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMGAX (16 years). NMGAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs NMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.85 vs. NMGAX (8.01). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.18 vs. NMGAX (-2.64).
| FSMAX | NMGAX | FSMAX / NMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.06 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.06 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.730 | 13.389 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 2.12B | 1,953% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.85 | 8.01 | 223% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.00 | 41.57 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.18 | -2.64 | -1,899% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.77 | 39.53 | 265% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement