Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMGAX
FSMAX vs NMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$95.09
Change+$0.88 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth A
Price$18.64
Change+$0.25 (+1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.02B
FSMAX vs NMGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGAX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NMGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. NMGAX (2.02B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGAX: FSMAX (0.47) vs NMGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMGAX (16 years). NMGAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs NMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.61 vs. NMGAX (11.15). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.88 vs. NMGAX (9.59).
| FSMAX | NMGAX | FSMAX / NMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.06 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.06 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.632 | 10.427 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 2.02B | 1,942% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.61 | 11.15 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.62 | 39.10 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.88 | 9.59 | 677% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.19 | 27.56 | 295% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement