Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMGAX
FSMAX vs NMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGAX
FSMAX vs NMGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NMGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. NMGAX (2.21B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGAX: FSMAX (0.50) vs NMGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGAX: FSMAX (15 years) vs NMGAX (17 years). NMGAX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs NMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. NMGAX (-21.52). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. NMGAX (-33.62).
| FSMAX | NMGAX | FSMAX / NMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.05 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.05 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 2.459 | 544% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 2.21B | 1,814% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | -21.52 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | -0.75 | -7,491% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -33.62 | -99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | 15.12 | 885% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers