Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs NMGCX
FSMAX vs NMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$95.75
Change-$1.12 (-1.16%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$17.33
Change-$0.22 (-1.25%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FSMAX vs NMGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGCX commentary
Dec 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NMGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 44.5B vs. NMGCX (1.81B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: FSMAX (1.10) vs NMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGCX: FSMAX (13 years) vs NMGCX (16 years). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs NMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.85 vs. NMGCX (18.94). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 54.67 vs. NMGCX (9.07).
| FSMAX | NMGCX | FSMAX / NMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.662 | 19.107 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.5B | 1.81B | 2,459% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.85 | 18.94 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.90 | -5.40 | -294% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.67 | 9.07 | 603% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.57 | 23.88 | 371% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers