Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs NMGCX
FSMAX vs NMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.51
Change+$0.64 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.78B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$17.19
Change+$0.19 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
FSMAX vs NMGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NMGCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.8B vs. NMGCX (1.93B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: FSMAX (1.10) vs NMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGCX: FSMAX (13 years) vs NMGCX (16 years). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs NMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.14 vs. NMGCX (17.82). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.39 vs. NMGCX (3.00).
| FSMAX | NMGCX | FSMAX / NMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.994 | 5.138 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8B | 1.93B | 2,116% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.14 | 17.82 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.40 | 2.02 | 1,060% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.39 | 3.00 | 1,613% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.18 | 25.39 | 355% |