Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs NMGCX
FSMAX vs NMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$76.01
Change-$3.55 (-4.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$14.21
Change-$0.40 (-2.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.64B
FSMAX vs NMGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NMGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. NMGCX (1.64B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: FSMAX (0.53) vs NMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMGCX (16 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs NMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.02 vs. NMGCX (-10.53). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 67.38 vs. NMGCX (4.93).
| FSMAX | NMGCX | FSMAX / NMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.81 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.81 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.456 | -10.642 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 1.64B | 2,226% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.02 | -10.53 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.74 | -8.11 | -108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.38 | 4.93 | 1,366% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.16 | -3.55 | -1,385% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...