Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMGCX
FSMAX vs NMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.47
Change+$0.80 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$17.84
Change+$0.08 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
FSMAX vs NMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGCX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NMGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. NMGCX (2B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: FSMAX (0.47) vs NMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMGCX (16 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs NMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. NMGCX (4.78). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 56.52 vs. NMGCX (1.24).
| FSMAX | NMGCX | FSMAX / NMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.81 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.81 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.070 | 8.624 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 2B | 1,965% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.54 | 4.78 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.26 | 31.56 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.52 | 1.24 | 4,545% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.23 | 12.84 | 594% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers