Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMGCX
FSMAX vs NMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.78
Change+$0.13 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.46B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$17.93
Change+$0.09 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.96B
FSMAX vs NMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NMGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.5B vs. NMGCX (1.96B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: FSMAX (0.43) vs NMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMGCX (16 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs NMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.62 vs. NMGCX (-8.74). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.53 vs. NMGCX (-18.03).
| FSMAX | NMGCX | FSMAX / NMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.81 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.81 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.492 | 4.214 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.5B | 1.96B | 2,114% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.62 | -8.74 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.92 | 22.41 | 223% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.53 | -18.03 | -186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.09 | 18.53 | 508% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement