Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMGCX
FSMAX vs NMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.88
Change-$0.07 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$18.36
Change+$0.05 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
FSMAX vs NMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NMGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. NMGCX (2.06B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: FSMAX (0.46) vs NMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMGCX (16 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs NMGCX (1000). FSMAX (21.74) and NMGCX (20.94) have marching annual gain over last year. FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.34 vs. NMGCX (1.20).
| FSMAX | NMGCX | FSMAX / NMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.81 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.81 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.478 | 11.988 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 2.06B | 1,924% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.74 | 20.94 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.63 | 21.26 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.34 | 1.20 | 4,280% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.66 | 16.75 | 488% |