Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMGCX
FSMAX vs NMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$101.54
Change-$1.22 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth C
Price$18.44
Change-$0.17 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.14B
FSMAX vs NMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NMGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. NMGCX (2.14B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: FSMAX (0.44) vs NMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMGCX (16 years). NMGCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs NMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.58 vs. NMGCX (9.15). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 53.17 vs. NMGCX (-4.75).
| FSMAX | NMGCX | FSMAX / NMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.81 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.81 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.072 | 13.823 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 2.14B | 1,933% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.58 | 9.15 | 214% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.02 | 39.19 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.17 | -4.75 | -1,119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.23 | 29.34 | 365% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers