Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMGCX
FSMAX vs NMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGCX
FSMAX vs NMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NMGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. NMGCX (2.21B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs NMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs NMGCX (17 years). NMGCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs NMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. NMGCX (-22.18). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. NMGCX (-36.45).
| FSMAX | NMGCX | FSMAX / NMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.80 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.80 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 1.989 | 672% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 2.21B | 1,814% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | -22.18 | -93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | -3.45 | -1,618% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -36.45 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | 5.66 | 2,363% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers