Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs NMGRX
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGRX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.51
Change+$0.64 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.78B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth R3
Price$17.55
Change+$0.19 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGRX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NMGRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.8B vs. NMGRX (1.93B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGRX: FSMAX (1.10) vs NMGRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGRX: FSMAX (13 years) vs NMGRX (16 years). NMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX (0) and NMGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.14 vs. NMGRX (18.58). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.39 vs. NMGRX (6.06).
| FSMAX | NMGRX | FSMAX / NMGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.994 | 5.153 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8B | 1.93B | 2,116% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.14 | 18.58 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.40 | 3.78 | 565% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.39 | 6.06 | 799% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.18 | 32.82 | 275% |