Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs NMGRX
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGRX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$85.16
Change+$1.54 (+1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.02B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth R3
Price$16.57
Change+$0.35 (+2.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGRX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NMGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36B vs. NMGRX (1.79B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGRX: FSMAX (0.54) vs NMGRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGRX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMGRX (16 years). NMGRX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and NMGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.90 vs. NMGRX (-0.37). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.52 vs. NMGRX (5.00).
| FSMAX | NMGRX | FSMAX / NMGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.32 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.32 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.989 | -2.816 | 284% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36B | 1.79B | 2,008% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.90 | -0.37 | -1,059% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.38 | 18.91 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.52 | 5.00 | 1,210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.20 | 12.00 | 493% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers