Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMGRX
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGRX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$99.49
Change+$1.11 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth R3
Price$18.80
Change+$0.07 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGRX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NMGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. NMGRX (2.08B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGRX: FSMAX (0.44) vs NMGRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGRX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMGRX (16 years). NMGRX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and NMGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.50 vs. NMGRX (17.28). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 59.13 vs. NMGRX (5.79).
| FSMAX | NMGRX | FSMAX / NMGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.32 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.32 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.057 | 12.642 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 2.08B | 1,970% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.50 | 17.28 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.89 | 32.77 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.13 | 5.79 | 1,021% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.70 | 30.40 | 335% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers