Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMGRX
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGRX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$88.18
Change+$0.11 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth R3
Price$17.49
Change+$0.09 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGRX commentary
Jun 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NMGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. NMGRX (1.92B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGRX: FSMAX (0.50) vs NMGRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGRX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMGRX (16 years). NMGRX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and NMGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.61 vs. NMGRX (7.41). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.73 vs. NMGRX (3.24).
| FSMAX | NMGRX | FSMAX / NMGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.32 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.32 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.092 | 4.254 | -73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 1.92B | 1,963% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.61 | 7.41 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.78 | 18.93 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.73 | 3.24 | 1,626% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.32 | 16.88 | 387% |