Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMGRX
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGRX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.39
Change-$0.12 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth R3
Price$18.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGRX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NMGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. NMGRX (2.05B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGRX: FSMAX (0.47) vs NMGRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGRX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMGRX (16 years). NMGRX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and NMGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NMGRX (13.67) and FSMAX (13.53) have marching annual gain over last year. FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 57.98 vs. NMGRX (4.12).
| FSMAX | NMGRX | FSMAX / NMGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.32 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.32 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.195 | 11.624 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 2.05B | 1,916% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.53 | 13.67 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.35 | 25.20 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.98 | 4.12 | 1,407% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.77 | 22.54 | 372% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers