Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMGRX
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGRX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$92.35
Change+$0.18 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth R3
Price$18.16
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGRX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NMGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. NMGRX (1.99B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGRX: FSMAX (0.50) vs NMGRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGRX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMGRX (16 years). NMGRX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and NMGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.32 vs. NMGRX (9.08). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 66.64 vs. NMGRX (10.44).
| FSMAX | NMGRX | FSMAX / NMGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.32 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.32 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.419 | 8.688 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 1.99B | 1,892% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.32 | 9.08 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.68 | 34.47 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.64 | 10.44 | 638% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.26 | 22.68 | 332% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement