Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs NMGRX
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGRX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$93.71
Change-$1.08 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth R3
Price$18.79
Change-$0.22 (-1.16%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGRX commentary
Nov 15, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NMGRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40B vs. NMGRX (1.93B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGRX: FSMAX (1.10) vs NMGRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGRX: FSMAX (13 years) vs NMGRX (15 years). NMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX (0) and NMGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.46 vs. NMGRX (34.44). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 54.93 vs. NMGRX (16.60).
| FSMAX | NMGRX | FSMAX / NMGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.432 | 28.881 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40B | 1.93B | 2,076% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.46 | 34.44 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.73 | -20.39 | -13% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.93 | 16.60 | 331% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.34 | 34.60 | 250% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...