Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMGRX
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGRX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.15
Change+$0.93 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth R3
Price$19.60
Change+$0.16 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.15B
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGRX commentary
Oct 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NMGRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. NMGRX (2.15B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGRX: FSMAX (0.44) vs NMGRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGRX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMGRX (16 years). NMGRX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and NMGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.49 vs. NMGRX (7.48). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.75 vs. NMGRX (-3.36).
| FSMAX | NMGRX | FSMAX / NMGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.32 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.32 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.501 | 14.817 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 2.15B | 1,925% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.49 | 7.48 | 234% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.80 | 40.59 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.75 | -3.36 | -1,571% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.56 | 38.62 | 286% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers