Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs NMGRX
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGRX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$77.78
Change+$0.62 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth R3
Price$14.80
Change+$0.09 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.62B
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGRX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NMGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. NMGRX (1.62B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGRX: FSMAX (0.53) vs NMGRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGRX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMGRX (16 years). NMGRX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and NMGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.35 vs. NMGRX (-7.89). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.85 vs. NMGRX (0.88).
| FSMAX | NMGRX | FSMAX / NMGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.32 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.32 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.097 | -11.863 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 1.62B | 2,257% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.35 | -7.89 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.53 | -7.72 | -72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.85 | 0.88 | 6,889% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.71 | 0.48 | 9,383% |