Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMGRX
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGRX
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGRX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NMGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. NMGRX (2.29B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGRX: FSMAX (0.48) vs NMGRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGRX: FSMAX (15 years) vs NMGRX (17 years). NMGRX (1.30) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and NMGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. NMGRX (-16.50). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. NMGRX (-30.03).
| FSMAX | NMGRX | FSMAX / NMGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.30 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.30 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.913 | 6.088 | 261% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 2.29B | 1,896% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.38 | -16.50 | -148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.28 | 1.91 | 3,314% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.12 | -30.03 | -130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.20 | 16.21 | 859% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers