Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMGRX
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMGRX
FSMAX vs NMGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMGRX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NMGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. NMGRX (2.21B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMGRX: FSMAX (0.50) vs NMGRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMGRX: FSMAX (15 years) vs NMGRX (17 years). NMGRX (1.30) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and NMGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. NMGRX (-21.75). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. NMGRX (-34.63).
| FSMAX | NMGRX | FSMAX / NMGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.30 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.30 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 2.257 | 592% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 2.21B | 1,814% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | -21.75 | -95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | -1.70 | -3,276% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -34.63 | -96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | 11.76 | 1,138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers