Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs NMPAX
FSMAX vs NMPAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMPAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$95.84
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Columbia Mid Cap Index Inst
Price$16.41
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FSMAX vs NMPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMPAX commentary
Nov 22, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NMPAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40B vs. NMPAX (2.69B). NMPAX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: NMPAX (1.19) vs FSMAX (1.10). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMPAX: FSMAX (13 years) vs NMPAX (25 years). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. NMPAX (12.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMPAX: FSMAX (0) vs NMPAX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.09 vs. NMPAX (22.25). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 56.62 vs. NMPAX (7.98).
| FSMAX | NMPAX | FSMAX / NMPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.777 | 16.079 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40B | 2.69B | 1,486% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.19 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.09 | 22.25 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.70 | -12.38 | -62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.62 | 7.98 | 709% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.67 | 8.75 | 979% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...