Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs NMPAX
FSMAX vs NMPAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMPAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$91.94
Change-$0.14 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.78B
Columbia Mid Cap Index Inst
Price$14.60
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.56B
FSMAX vs NMPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMPAX commentary
Jan 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NMPAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.8B vs. NMPAX (2.56B). NMPAX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: NMPAX (1.19) vs FSMAX (1.10). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMPAX: FSMAX (13 years) vs NMPAX (25 years). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. NMPAX (12.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMPAX: FSMAX (0) vs NMPAX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.97 vs. NMPAX (6.38). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.73 vs. NMPAX (-2.66).
| FSMAX | NMPAX | FSMAX / NMPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.166 | 0.690 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8B | 2.56B | 1,597% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.19 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.97 | 6.38 | 329% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.49 | -9.40 | -143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.73 | -2.66 | -1,792% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.88 | 3.03 | 2,736% |