Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMPAX
FSMAX vs NMPAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMPAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$89.47
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
Columbia Mid Cap Index Inst
Price$14.11
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.45B
FSMAX vs NMPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMPAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NMPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. NMPAX (2.45B). NMPAX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: NMPAX (1.41) vs FSMAX (0.50). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMPAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMPAX (25 years). NMPAX (0.34) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMPAX: FSMAX (0) vs NMPAX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.51 vs. NMPAX (-5.35). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.40 vs. NMPAX (0.49).
| FSMAX | NMPAX | FSMAX / NMPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.20 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.34 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.540 | -2.621 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 2.45B | 1,533% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.41 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.51 | -5.35 | -215% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.40 | -3.97 | -815% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.40 | 0.49 | 10,417% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.19 | -5.82 | -1,190% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers