Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs NMPAX
FSMAX vs NMPAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMPAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$81.49
Change+$2.00 (+2.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Columbia Mid Cap Index Inst
Price$13.26
Change+$0.27 (+2.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
FSMAX vs NMPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMPAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NMPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. NMPAX (2.27B). NMPAX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: NMPAX (1.45) vs FSMAX (0.53). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMPAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMPAX (25 years). NMPAX (0.34) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMPAX: FSMAX (0) vs NMPAX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.98 vs. NMPAX (-11.23). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 66.04 vs. NMPAX (14.20).
| FSMAX | NMPAX | FSMAX / NMPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.20 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.34 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.533 | -10.414 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 2.27B | 1,607% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.45 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.98 | -11.23 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.93 | -13.63 | -80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.04 | 14.20 | 465% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.78 | -13.51 | -368% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers