Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMPAX
FSMAX vs NMPAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMPAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.93
Change-$0.10 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
Columbia Mid Cap Index Inst
Price$14.28
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.5B
FSMAX vs NMPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMPAX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NMPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. NMPAX (2.5B). NMPAX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: NMPAX (1.31) vs FSMAX (0.46). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMPAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMPAX (25 years). NMPAX (0.33) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMPAX: FSMAX (0) vs NMPAX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.86 vs. NMPAX (1.49). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.00 vs. NMPAX (6.00).
| FSMAX | NMPAX | FSMAX / NMPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.20 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.33 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.566 | -1.290 | -354% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 2.5B | 1,582% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 1.31 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.86 | 1.49 | 1,470% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.84 | 3.83 | 1,015% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.00 | 6.00 | 867% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.21 | -1.13 | -7,474% |