Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMPAX
FSMAX vs NMPAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMPAX
FSMAX vs NMPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMPAX commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NMPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. NMPAX (2.57B). NMPAX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: NMPAX (1.16) vs FSMAX (0.50). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMPAX: FSMAX (15 years) vs NMPAX (26 years). NMPAX (0.34) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NMPAX (16.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMPAX: FSMAX (0) vs NMPAX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.54 vs. NMPAX (13.55). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.76 vs. NMPAX (-3.15).
| FSMAX | NMPAX | FSMAX / NMPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.20 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.34 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.006 | 14.487 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 2.57B | 1,560% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.16 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.54 | 13.55 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.92 | 22.97 | 335% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.76 | -3.15 | -1,451% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.51 | 16.15 | 883% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers