Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NRMGX
FSMAX vs NRMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NRMGX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$90.60
Change+$1.13 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$18.49
Change+$0.24 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
FSMAX vs NRMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NRMGX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NRMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. NRMGX (1.94B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NRMGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs NRMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NRMGX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NRMGX (12 years). NRMGX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and NRMGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. NRMGX (9.41). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.39 vs. NRMGX (9.52).
| FSMAX | NRMGX | FSMAX / NRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.59 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.59 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.551 | 6.043 | -26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 1.94B | 1,938% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.97 | 9.41 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.47 | 20.94 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.39 | 9.52 | 540% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.53 | 22.94 | 303% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement