Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NRMGX
FSMAX vs NRMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NRMGX
FSMAX vs NRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NRMGX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NRMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. NRMGX (2.21B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NRMGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs NRMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NRMGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs NRMGX (13 years). NRMGX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and NRMGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. NRMGX (-21.14). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. NRMGX (-31.89).
| FSMAX | NRMGX | FSMAX / NRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.58 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.58 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 2.727 | 490% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 2.21B | 1,814% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | -21.14 | -97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 0.80 | 6,990% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -31.89 | -104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | 18.90 | 708% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement