Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs OEGCX
FSMAX vs OEGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs OEGCX
FSMAX vs OEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. OEGCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and OEGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. OEGCX (6.98B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than OEGCX: FSMAX (0.48) vs OEGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than OEGCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs OEGCX (26 years). OEGCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). OEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than OEGCX: FSMAX (0) vs OEGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. OEGCX (9.55). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. OEGCX (-15.92).
| FSMAX | OEGCX | FSMAX / OEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.77 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.77 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.913 | 20.913 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 6.98B | 623% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.38 | 9.55 | 255% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.28 | 28.91 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.12 | -15.92 | -246% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.20 | 42.81 | 325% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement