Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs OEGCX
FSMAX vs OEGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs OEGCX
FSMAX vs OEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. OEGCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and OEGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. OEGCX (6.51B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than OEGCX: FSMAX (0.49) vs OEGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than OEGCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs OEGCX (26 years). OEGCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). OEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than OEGCX: FSMAX (0) vs OEGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. OEGCX (-3.65). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. OEGCX (-28.26).
| FSMAX | OEGCX | FSMAX / OEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.77 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.77 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 11.499 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 6.51B | 616% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.05 | -3.65 | -357% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.92 | 24.48 | 261% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | -28.26 | -116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.42 | 34.01 | 392% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement