Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs OTCBX
FSMAX vs OTCBX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs OTCBX
FSMAX vs OTCBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. OTCBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and OTCBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. OTCBX (13B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than OTCBX: FSMAX (0.50) vs OTCBX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than OTCBX: FSMAX (15 years) vs OTCBX (33 years). OTCBX (1.78) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). OTCBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than OTCBX: FSMAX (0) vs OTCBX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. OTCBX (-21.41). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. OTCBX (-26.28).
| FSMAX | OTCBX | FSMAX / OTCBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.77 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.78 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 1.618 | 826% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 13B | 308% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | -21.41 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | -7.84 | -712% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -26.28 | -126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | 43.73 | 306% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers