Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs OTCBX
FSMAX vs OTCBX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs OTCBX
FSMAX vs OTCBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. OTCBX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and OTCBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. OTCBX (12.5B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than OTCBX: FSMAX (0.49) vs OTCBX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than OTCBX: FSMAX (15 years) vs OTCBX (33 years). OTCBX (1.78) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). OTCBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than OTCBX: FSMAX (0) vs OTCBX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.25 vs. OTCBX (-24.93). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. OTCBX (-29.91).
| FSMAX | OTCBX | FSMAX / OTCBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.77 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.78 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.758 | -0.502 | -2,739% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 12.5B | 321% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.25 | -24.93 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.66 | -6.26 | -1,050% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | -29.91 | -110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.46 | 42.07 | 315% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers