Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs OTCGX
FSMAX vs OTCGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs OTCGX
FSMAX vs OTCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. OTCGX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and OTCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. OTCGX (12.3B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than OTCGX: FSMAX (0.49) vs OTCGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than OTCGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs OTCGX (21 years). OTCGX (1.78) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). OTCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and OTCGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. OTCGX (-25.68). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.57 vs. OTCGX (-29.67).
| FSMAX | OTCGX | FSMAX / OTCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.77 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.78 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.490 | -0.618 | -2,182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 12.3B | 326% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.03 | -25.68 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.71 | -6.36 | -1,050% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.57 | -29.67 | -110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.27 | 41.55 | 316% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement