Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs OTCGX
FSMAX vs OTCGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs OTCGX
FSMAX vs OTCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. OTCGX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and OTCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. OTCGX (13B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than OTCGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs OTCGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than OTCGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs OTCGX (21 years). OTCGX (1.78) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). OTCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and OTCGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. OTCGX (-21.49). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. OTCGX (-26.41).
| FSMAX | OTCGX | FSMAX / OTCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.77 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.78 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 1.630 | 820% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 13B | 308% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | -21.49 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | -8.04 | -695% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -26.41 | -126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | 43.26 | 309% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers