Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs PEGCX
FSMAX vs PEGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs PEGCX
FSMAX vs PEGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. PEGCX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and PEGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. PEGCX (1.7B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than PEGCX: FSMAX (0.48) vs PEGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than PEGCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs PEGCX (30 years). PEGCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). PEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PEGCX: FSMAX (0) vs PEGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.75 vs. PEGCX (-10.17). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. PEGCX (-37.88).
| FSMAX | PEGCX | FSMAX / PEGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.97 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.97 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.380 | 0.787 | 1,701% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 1.7B | 2,554% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.75 | -10.17 | -194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.72 | -8.47 | -682% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -37.88 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.39 | -84.77 | -155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers