Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs PICMX
FSMAX vs PICMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs PICMX
FSMAX vs PICMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. PICMX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and PICMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. PICMX (383M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than PICMX: FSMAX (0.50) vs PICMX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than PICMX: FSMAX (15 years) vs PICMX (19 years). PICMX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). PICMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PICMX: FSMAX (0) vs PICMX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.51 vs. PICMX (-34.89). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.05 vs. PICMX (-45.95).
| FSMAX | PICMX | FSMAX / PICMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.03 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.03 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.705 | -3.511 | -533% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 383M | 10,470% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.51 | -34.89 | -70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.84 | -25.69 | -272% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.05 | -45.95 | -85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.64 | 69.46 | 202% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement