Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs PKSCX
FSMAX vs PKSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs PKSCX
FSMAX vs PKSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. PKSCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and PKSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. PKSCX (1.77B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than PKSCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs PKSCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than PKSCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs PKSCX (24 years). PKSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. PKSCX (13.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PKSCX: FSMAX (0) vs PKSCX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. PKSCX (-11.35). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. PKSCX (-17.16).
| FSMAX | PKSCX | FSMAX / PKSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.99 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.99 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 5.924 | 260% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 1.77B | 2,407% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | -11.35 | -257% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | -0.99 | -7,430% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | -17.16 | -196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | 73.52 | 209% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers