Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs PKSCX
FSMAX vs PKSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs PKSCX
FSMAX vs PKSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. PKSCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and PKSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. PKSCX (1.76B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than PKSCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs PKSCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than PKSCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs PKSCX (24 years). PKSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. PKSCX (13.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PKSCX: FSMAX (0) vs PKSCX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.51 vs. PKSCX (-15.04). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.00 vs. PKSCX (-20.40).
| FSMAX | PKSCX | FSMAX / PKSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.99 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.99 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.668 | 2.861 | 478% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 1.76B | 2,426% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.51 | -15.04 | -203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.53 | -2.79 | -2,567% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.00 | -20.40 | -181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.36 | 57.08 | 248% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers