Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs PMBCX
FSMAX vs PMBCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs PMBCX
FSMAX vs PMBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. PMBCX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and PMBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. PMBCX (21.3B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than PMBCX: FSMAX (0.49) vs PMBCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than PMBCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs PMBCX (20 years). PMBCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. PMBCX (13.70). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PMBCX: FSMAX (0) vs PMBCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.25 vs. PMBCX (-19.08). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. PMBCX (-15.79).
| FSMAX | PMBCX | FSMAX / PMBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.71 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.71 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.758 | -7.709 | -178% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 21.3B | 188% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.25 | -19.08 | -75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.66 | 5.03 | 1,306% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | -15.79 | -208% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.46 | 49.80 | 266% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers