Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs POAGX
FSMAX vs POAGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs POAGX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.46
Change-$0.29 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
PRIMECAP Odyssey Aggressive Growth
Price$48.21
Change+$0.09 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.01B
FSMAX vs POAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. POAGX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and POAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. POAGX (6.01B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than POAGX: FSMAX (0.46) vs POAGX (0.02). FSMAX was incepted earlier than POAGX: FSMAX (14 years) vs POAGX (21 years). POAGX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX (9.00) and POAGX (9.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than POAGX: FSMAX (0) vs POAGX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.00 vs. POAGX (8.38). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 53.33 vs. POAGX (1.69).
| FSMAX | POAGX | FSMAX / POAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.66 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.66 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.459 | 9.190 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 6.01B | 659% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.02 | 1,935% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.00 | 8.38 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.94 | 8.53 | 410% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.33 | 1.69 | 3,148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.49 | 37.67 | 227% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers