Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs POAGX
FSMAX vs POAGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs POAGX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.76
Change+$0.39 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
PRIMECAP Odyssey Aggressive Growth
Price$53.85
Change+$0.33 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.61B
FSMAX vs POAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. POAGX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and POAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. POAGX (6.61B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than POAGX: FSMAX (0.44) vs POAGX (0.02). FSMAX was incepted earlier than POAGX: FSMAX (14 years) vs POAGX (21 years). POAGX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX (9.00) and POAGX (9.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than POAGX: FSMAX (0) vs POAGX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.11 vs. POAGX (13.44). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 53.96 vs. POAGX (7.80).
| FSMAX | POAGX | FSMAX / POAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.66 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.66 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.643 | 21.443 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 6.61B | 626% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.02 | 2,027% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.11 | 13.44 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.37 | 42.22 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.96 | 7.80 | 692% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.44 | 63.54 | 168% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement