Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs POAGX
FSMAX vs POAGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs POAGX
FSMAX vs POAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. POAGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and POAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. POAGX (7.47B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than POAGX: FSMAX (0.49) vs POAGX (0.25). FSMAX was incepted earlier than POAGX: FSMAX (15 years) vs POAGX (22 years). POAGX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. POAGX (11.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than POAGX: FSMAX (0) vs POAGX (2000). POAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.04 vs. FSMAX (13.05). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. POAGX (2.03).
| FSMAX | POAGX | FSMAX / POAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.66 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.66 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 21.254 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 7.47B | 537% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.25 | 196% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.05 | 19.04 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.92 | 42.69 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | 2.03 | 1,611% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.42 | 76.82 | 174% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers