Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs PQCCX
FSMAX vs PQCCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs PQCCX
FSMAX vs PQCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. PQCCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and PQCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. PQCCX (13.3M). PQCCX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: PQCCX (1.08) vs FSMAX (0.50). FSMAX was incepted earlier than PQCCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs PQCCX (10 years). PQCCX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). PQCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and PQCCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. PQCCX (18.10). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. PQCCX (-17.49).
| FSMAX | PQCCX | FSMAX / PQCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.20 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.50 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 14.431 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 13.3M | 301,504% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.08 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | 18.10 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 13.45 | 415% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -17.49 | -190% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers