Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs PRNHX
FSMAX vs PRNHX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs PRNHX
FSMAX vs PRNHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. PRNHX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and PRNHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. PRNHX (13B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than PRNHX: FSMAX (0.49) vs PRNHX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than PRNHX: FSMAX (15 years) vs PRNHX (66 years). PRNHX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). PRNHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.80 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRNHX: FSMAX (0) vs PRNHX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.31 vs. PRNHX (3.61). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.17 vs. PRNHX (-42.47).
| FSMAX | PRNHX | FSMAX / PRNHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.80 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.80 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.960 | 10.346 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 13B | 308% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.31 | 3.61 | 507% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.42 | 3.97 | 1,571% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.17 | -42.47 | -73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.51 | 23.16 | 559% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers