Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs PSKCX
FSMAX vs PSKCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs PSKCX
FSMAX vs PSKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. PSKCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and PSKCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. PSKCX (384M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than PSKCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs PSKCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than PSKCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs PSKCX (26 years). PSKCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). PSKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSKCX: FSMAX (0) vs PSKCX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. PSKCX (-48.65). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. PSKCX (-57.45).
| FSMAX | PSKCX | FSMAX / PSKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.04 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.04 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | -5.002 | -267% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 384M | 10,443% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | -48.65 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | -43.10 | -130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.18 | -57.45 | -58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.82 | 23.05 | 581% |