Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs RCKSX
FSMAX vs RCKSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs RCKSX
FSMAX vs RCKSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. RCKSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and RCKSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. RCKSX (13.1M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than RCKSX: FSMAX (0.50) vs RCKSX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than RCKSX: FSMAX (15 years) vs RCKSX (21 years). RCKSX (1.49) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. RCKSX (12.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCKSX: FSMAX (0) vs RCKSX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. RCKSX (13.21). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. RCKSX (30.46).
| FSMAX | RCKSX | FSMAX / RCKSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.25 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.49 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 15.471 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 13.1M | 325,954% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | 13.21 | 221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 59.87 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | 30.46 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | 107.52 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement