Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs RMBMX
FSMAX vs RMBMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs RMBMX
FSMAX vs RMBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. RMBMX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and RMBMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. RMBMX (192M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than RMBMX: FSMAX (0.50) vs RMBMX (0.30). FSMAX was incepted earlier than RMBMX: FSMAX (15 years) vs RMBMX (21 years). RMBMX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. RMBMX (12.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBMX: FSMAX (0) vs RMBMX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. RMBMX (-2.08). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. RMBMX (-16.28).
| FSMAX | RMBMX | FSMAX / RMBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.80 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.09 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.427 | 11.665 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 192M | 22,240% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.30 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.23 | -2.08 | -1,407% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.83 | 2.31 | 3,195% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | -16.28 | -207% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.47 | -0.55 | -27,685% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers