Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs RMBMX
FSMAX vs RMBMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs RMBMX
FSMAX vs RMBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. RMBMX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and RMBMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. RMBMX (179M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than RMBMX: FSMAX (0.49) vs RMBMX (0.30). FSMAX was incepted earlier than RMBMX: FSMAX (15 years) vs RMBMX (22 years). RMBMX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. RMBMX (12.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBMX: FSMAX (0) vs RMBMX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.97 vs. RMBMX (-11.63). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.60 vs. RMBMX (-24.55).
| FSMAX | RMBMX | FSMAX / RMBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.80 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.09 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.205 | 5.738 | 248% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 179M | 22,402% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.30 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.97 | -11.63 | -129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.32 | -6.51 | -1,019% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.60 | -24.55 | -137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.38 | -8.95 | -1,491% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers