Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs RMBMX
FSMAX vs RMBMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs RMBMX
FSMAX vs RMBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. RMBMX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and RMBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. RMBMX (188M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than RMBMX: FSMAX (0.50) vs RMBMX (0.29). FSMAX was incepted earlier than RMBMX: FSMAX (15 years) vs RMBMX (22 years). RMBMX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. RMBMX (12.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBMX: FSMAX (0) vs RMBMX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. RMBMX (-5.15). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. RMBMX (-19.85).
| FSMAX | RMBMX | FSMAX / RMBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.80 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.09 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | 11.101 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 188M | 21,330% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.29 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.68 | -5.15 | -460% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.74 | -1.12 | -6,471% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.14 | -19.85 | -202% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.49 | -7.19 | -1,872% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers