Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs RMDCX
FSMAX vs RMDCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs RMDCX
FSMAX vs RMDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. RMDCX commentary
Sep 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and RMDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. RMDCX (524M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than RMDCX: FSMAX (0.49) vs RMDCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than RMDCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs RMDCX (25 years). RMDCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). RMDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMDCX: FSMAX (0) vs RMDCX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.50 vs. RMDCX (-22.81). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.14 vs. RMDCX (-43.95).
| FSMAX | RMDCX | FSMAX / RMDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.78 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.78 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.953 | 9.544 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 524M | 7,653% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.50 | -22.81 | -81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.83 | 17.33 | 368% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.14 | -43.95 | -73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.49 | -16.19 | -812% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement