Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs RMDCX
FSMAX vs RMDCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs RMDCX
FSMAX vs RMDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. RMDCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and RMDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. RMDCX (518M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than RMDCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs RMDCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than RMDCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs RMDCX (24 years). RMDCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). RMDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMDCX: FSMAX (0) vs RMDCX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.47 vs. RMDCX (-14.64). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.19 vs. RMDCX (-37.87).
| FSMAX | RMDCX | FSMAX / RMDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.78 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.78 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.556 | 13.693 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 518M | 8,243% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.47 | -14.64 | -208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.03 | 24.55 | 302% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.19 | -37.87 | -93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.75 | -4.86 | -3,163% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement