Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs RMOCX
FSMAX vs RMOCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs RMOCX
FSMAX vs RMOCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. RMOCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and RMOCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. RMOCX (62.9M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than RMOCX: FSMAX (0.49) vs RMOCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than RMOCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs RMOCX (19 years). RMOCX (6.54) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). RMOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMOCX: FSMAX (0) vs RMOCX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. RMOCX (-0.87). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. RMOCX (-36.42).
| FSMAX | RMOCX | FSMAX / RMOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.11 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 6.54 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.370 | 2.119 | 631% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 62.9M | 63,752% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.05 | -0.87 | -1,507% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.92 | 39.98 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | -36.42 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.42 | -3.63 | -3,674% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement